On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 01:49:33PM +0200, Tom Beer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> von den unten angehängten Meldungen bekomme ich 100 oder so jeden Tag.
> In dem Rechner sind zwei Netzwerkkarten. Wie bekomme ich es hin, diese nicht
> mehr zu bekommen? Falls mehr infos nötig sind, gerne.
Du hast beide Netzwerkkarten im gleichen Netz.
Dafür gibt es eigendlich keinen Grund - außer man mag Probleme.
> Jun 6 05:09:54 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.1 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> Jun 6 05:09:59 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> Jun 6 05:27:21 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> arp: 192.168.1.4 is on ed0 but got reply from 00:00:cb:59:bc:c8 on rl0
> Jun 6 05:32:31 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.4 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:59:bc:c8 on rl0
> Jun 6 05:53:49 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.1 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> Jun 6 05:53:54 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.1 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> arp: 192.168.1.2 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:00:cb:71:24:67 on rl0
> Jun 6 06:00:07 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.2 is on lo0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:24:67 on rl0
> Jun 6 06:00:07 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.1 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> Jun 6 06:09:54 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.1 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
> Jun 6 06:09:59 milestone /kernel: arp: 192.168.1.11 is on ed0 but got reply
> from 00:00:cb:71:15:69 on rl0
-- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso(at)cicely.de Usergroup info(at)cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(at)de.FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe de-bsd-questions" in the body of the messageReceived on Fri 07 Jun 2002 - 14:15:27 CEST