On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 03:14:31PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
> Andreas Klemm said:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:58:15AM -0500, Joseph Scott wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > >
> > > I was under the impression that the general Linux community felt
> > > that the 2.2 kernel was the new stable. I always thought it was neat how
> > > the new Linux 2.2 kernel and the new FreeBSD 3 came out around the same
> > > time, and both seemed to make big jumps in their use of things like smp.
> >
> > No, FreeBSD SMP is in good shape since over a year or so ...
> >
> FreeBSD SMP needs in-depth work, but does work okay for most workstation
> loads.
To bring in some new flesh here ... I repeated the tests with Linux
Kernel release 2.2.3. And yes, the results are better ...
But we are still 19% better ;-)
Andreas ///
-- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms Linux 2.2.3 by 19% ;-) See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(at)de.FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe de-bsd-chat" in the body of the messageReceived on Mon 15 Mar 1999 - 22:30:35 CET