Re: Tastaturlayoute

From: <siefke_listen(at)web.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:42:42 +0100

Hallo,

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:46:14 +0100 (CET) Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Wenn es unter Gnome funktioniert, dann ist es jedenfalls
> kein grundsätzliches Problem, sondern es liegt irgendwie
> an xfce bzw. dessen Konfiguration. Kann es vielleicht
> sein, dass xfce am Font-Path herumfummelt? Man könnte
> mal versuchen, das Kommando » xset q | grep -A1 Font «
> unter Gnome und unter xfce einzugeben und nachzusehen,
> ob es da einen Unterschied gibt.

sieht aber gleich aus:

Gnome:
Font Path:
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/URW/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/ae_fonts_mono,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,built-ins

--
Font cache:
Server does not have the FontCache Extension
XFCE
Font Path:
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/URW/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/ae_fonts_mono,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,built-ins
--
Font cache:
Server does not have the FontCache Extension
MFG
Silvio
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(at)de.FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe de-bsd-questions" in the body of the message
Received on Thu 26 Jan 2012 - 18:43:00 CET

search this site