Re: Noch einmal Linux-ABI..

From: Oliver Fromme <olli(at)>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:33:50 +0200 (CEST)

Peter Ross <petros(at)> wrote:
> [...]
> Which one is the native FreeBSD ABI? It does not matter. Basically the only
> difference is that (currently; this could easily be changed in a future
> release, and probably will be after this) the FreeBSD glue functions are
> statically linked into the kernel, and the Linux glue functions can be
> statically linked, or they can be accessed via a kernel module.
> Vielleicht bloede Frage: Was wuerde man sich antun, wenn man die Linux-ABI
> zur Default-ABI machen wuerde? Dahinter lauft ja trotzdem ein anderer
> Kernel mit dem beliebten Netzcode und anderer Speicherverwaltung etc.

Du würdest Dir antun, daß das System nach dem Starten des
Kernels panict, weil es /sbin/init nicht ausführen kann. ;-)

root(at)haluter:~# brandelf /sbin/init
File '/sbin/init' is of brand 'FreeBSD' (9).

Gegenfrage: Was für einen _Vorteil_ würdest Du von der von
Dir beschriebenen Modifikation erwarten?


Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(at)
with "unsubscribe de-bsd-questions" in the body of the message
Received on Wed 18 Apr 2001 - 16:33:56 CEST

search this site