>It seems that Mark Murray said:
>>
>> Er, no. PHKmalloc is a 2.2 thing. I cannot remember dates, but it may be
>> worth a recompile of perl5 on your current system to see if this goes away.
>
>Probably but ensure that when you configure Perl not to use the Perl's
>malloc (which derived from the BSD one if I remember well).
Wasn't this the other way around? The BSD version was derived from the perl
version? (And the perl version was derived from a version from somewhere like
caltech?)
Cheers,
-Peter
Received on Sun 17 Mar 1996 - 15:15:43 CET